tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6867503761315699133.post2533813468830751850..comments2023-09-25T07:37:47.803-04:00Comments on Plumbum et Circenses: CarryingZerCoolhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08347518441827166007noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6867503761315699133.post-3893108984419038152009-12-24T17:00:16.498-05:002009-12-24T17:00:16.498-05:00Merry Christmas, ZerCool.
And you're right ab...Merry Christmas, ZerCool.<br /><br />And you're right about going to the range and trying things. The Mrs. didn't want *anything*, and now she wants a Sig. Keep trying until you find one you like!Borepatchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05029434172945099693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6867503761315699133.post-16016069212327146612009-12-20T18:07:28.640-05:002009-12-20T18:07:28.640-05:00Good point, Jay, and at least partially addressed ...Good point, Jay, and at least partially addressed in the edit I just made.<br /><br />I'll nitpick and say there's lots more "Lady Smiths" than just the 637. There is, off hand, a 60, 637, 640, 642... :-D Easy marketing for S&W, just different etching on a sideplate and a nice case to put the gun in. I'd carry a Lady Smith if the price was right!ZerCoolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08347518441827166007noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6867503761315699133.post-89795461462073438782009-12-20T14:18:18.605-05:002009-12-20T14:18:18.605-05:00Slight nit: A LadySmith 3913 wouldn't be a bad...Slight nit: A LadySmith 3913 wouldn't be a bad option at all.<br /><br />I assume you mean the LadySmith 637 J-frame. Just wanted to clarify that there may be a Ladysmith that's okay for a new shooter...<br /><br />Great post BTW.Jay Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11085873775096542015noreply@blogger.com