data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff51a/ff51aa22fbbc0538b1efdd803d7437cc57f88863" alt="kahr 002"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b374b/b374b5630030272b389636b26135bcd1bb393af2" alt="kahr 003"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e893/4e893529e568c32d7d56354baa7c3ba438760111" alt="kahr 004"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f217d/f217dd619bb2552156fa6ed2d415ee82361d1da8" alt="kahr 009"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54407/54407e116f6ff3386d5c90715bfb1daee4fb407f" alt="kahr 008"
The velvety stuff on the grip is a Brooks Tactical AGRIP. Super-thin (you can read the Kahr logo through it), grippy without being tacky, and quite comfortable. It was on the gun when I got it, and I don't intend to remove it.
642 and 1911 for size comparison. The PM9 is the same height as the 642, about an inch shorter, and 3/8" thinner. Weight is comparable. You could carry the 642 AND the PM9 and still not be up to the weight of a steel 1911A1.
Will the PM9 replace the 642 for carry? Not 100% of the time, but there will certainly be times it's more appropriate!
1 comment:
That’s a great little gun you’ve got there. Years ago I had a MK40 that I still regret selling. It was the all steel version that would feel like a brick compared to yours. The only thing that I didn’t like about mine was the stout recoil that would shake the grips screws loose every 15 or 20 rounds. Finally had to fix that with locktite.
Post a Comment